@RealityAudit2022 [ THUR JAN 20 2022 9:04 pm : Status Unconfirmed Receipt : Undeclinable Deliverance ] - 911 Emergency - InlandPsych : Doctor Hozair Mohammed Syed MD - Oath [ Do No Harm : Oath Violated - Proved Evident ] NATIONAL SECURITY / AGNOTOLOGY / UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT / STATE SPONSORED HATE / ADDRESS TO THE FBI [ WED JUNE 23 2021 3:10am - IGNORED ]
Auto-Play Enabled. Press [ Play ] Button if the audio spoken voice narrative is not playing...
The memespace is an abstract cultural container populated by memes.
Memes are similar to genes and viruses in that they tend to propagate, evolve, corrupt and mutate. All these actions take place in the memespace. As a direct result, the memespace is considered volatile and prone to errors and corruption without rigorous error correction.
Memetic engineering, marketing, advertising, brainwashing, disinformation, doctrine, evangelism, indoctrination, education, groupthink, promotion, propaganda, publicity, and other forms of cultural mutation develop in the memespace.
The concept of the memespace requires a belief that the mind – and the collective mind, culture – is programmable. Memespace is adapted from namespace and assumes that human culture is programmable. In programming parlance, the memesphere is defined as cultural standard input while the memespace is defined as the cultural namespace.
The Technology In Use Is a Trust Building Network, actively working, as such, the rigorous error correction is observed here.
Image Name:@RealityAudit-Emoji-Handshake.png
If you want to leave any feedback or suggestion, please fill the form below or Email : care@inlandpsych.com. To file any grievance with IPMG, please go visit our grievances page.
This problem can not be solved by grievances!
PLEASE CONTINUE TO READ...... See Specific Notations as: [ Patient To Doctors ] Highlighted In Reference To Materials Being Expressed Herein!
Patient:
James Martin Driskill
3260 Grande Vista
San Bernardino CA 92405
Phone: 909-882-8759
email: realuphuman.net@gmail.com
Also In Reference:
Kareo Patient Portal
https://www.kareo.com/
Get In Touch
Call Us 1(888)775-2736
3353 Michelson Suite 400
Irvine, CA 92612
4. Breaking new ground
This would be the only emoji depicting physical agreement amongst two people
of different skintones in a way that is not explicitly romantic in nature.
YES DOCTOR - EXACTLY WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM?
DOCTOR, AS IT STANDS - YOUR NONSENSE!
YOUR LIES
YOU ARE KILLING ME INTENTIONALLY!
WITH APPARENTLY THE COOPERATION
OF YOUR COWORKERS!
------[ Please Continue To Read.... ].....
This page title:
<title> @RealityAudit2022 [ THUR JAN 20 2022 9:04 pm : Status Unconfirmed Receipt : Undeclinable Deliverance ] - 911 Emergency - InlandPsych : Doctor Hozair Mohammed Syed MD - Oath [ Do No Harm : Oath Violated - Proved Evident ] NATIONAL SECURITY / AGNOTOLOGY / UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT / STATE SPONSORED HATE / ADDRESS TO THE FBI [ WED JUNE 23 2021 3:10am - IGNORED ]
</title>
This page intention:
A page of memetic engineering [ real time ] properties...
Act accordingly
Your behavioral response
demanded of your
fiduciary responsibility!
[ It would be futile to resist ]
[ legally binding if necessary ]
[ Do no harm! ]
This matter has been classified
A MATTER OF LEGAL NECESSITY!
A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY!
A MATTER OF PARAMOUNT PRIORITY!
A defense that permits a person to act in a criminal manner when an emergency situation, not of the person's own creation compels the person to act in a criminal manner to avoid greater harm from occurring.
Necessity and Duress - LawShelf
https://lawshelf.com/coursewarecontentview/necessity-and-duress
Necessity and Duress
Terms:
Necessity:
A defense that permits a person to act in a criminal manner when an emergency situation, not of the person's own creation compels the person to act in a criminal manner to avoid greater harm from occurring.
Public Necessity:
A necessity that involves the public's interest.
Duress:
The compelling of a person to undertake an action against his or her will by the threat of physical or economic harm.
The defense of necessity is available where the defendant acted under the reasonable belief that committing his offense would prevent a greater evil or harm from occurring. For example:
Christopher lives in a town that sits right on the edge of the Hundred Acre Woods. At the end of a hot and dry summer some brush in the woods catches fire and a forest fire quickly develops and spreads. The fire is quickly heading toward the town and Christopher believes that if he burns the row of houses directly on the edge of the forest he will create a fire wall which will then protect the rest of the town. If Christopher does, in fact, burn some of the houses under the reasonable belief that it will protect the rest of the town from the forest fire, he will be able to use the defense of necessity if he is charged with arson.
There are, however, several requirements that must be met in order for the defendant to use necessity as a defense.
The defendant must reasonably believe that an actual threat exists. Therefore, in order to use the defense, Christopher must reasonably believe that the forest fire will destroy all or part of the town. Please note that as long as this belief is reasonable, he will be able to use the defense even if the forest fire never actually approaches the town.
The defendant must reasonably believe that the threat he is trying to prevent is greater than the damage that will result from his actions. Therefore, Christopher will be able to use the necessity defense if he reasonably believes that burning some of the houses at the edge of the forest is a lesser evil than allowing the entire town to burn.
The threatened harm that the defendant is trying to prevent with his actions must be imminent.
The defendant can only use the necessity defense if there was no other, less harmful way to avoid the threatened danger. In the above example, Christopher will only be able to use the necessity defense if burning a few of the houses was the least harmful way to protect the town.
The defendant will only be able to use the defense if the defendant himself was not at fault in creating the situation that made it necessary to commit his crime. In other words, if Christopher himself had been responsible for the forest fire, he would not be able to use necessity as a defense to burning those houses.
Most jurisdictions hold that economic necessity alone does not justify the commission of criminal acts. Therefore, one who commits a crime out of economic necessity, for example if a person robs a convenience store because he is unemployed and has no other way of making money and feeding his family, he will not be able to use the necessity defense.
An interesting issue that has evolved over the last twenty-five years has been situations in which prisoners have escaped from jail and claim that escaping was the only way to avoid greater harm such as sexual assault and beatings. Typically, these arguments have been rejected where the prisoners have had other non-criminal options available to them. However, there have been a few cases where the court has allowed this defense to at least be argued to the jury, where the defendant has proven that efforts to secure protection from prison authorities or the courts would have been either impossible or useless. However, the same courts have indicated that, even when necessity can apply to the crime of escape, the defendant will only be able to use the defense successfully if he can show that, once the immediate threat of harm was over, he turned himself in to proper authorities. See People v. Lovercamp, 43 Cal. App. 3d 823 (1974).
For example:
Fred is currently serving a fifteen year prison sentence for breaking into Barney’s house. Fred has suffered several beatings and sexual assaults from other inmates in the prison. Fred has tried to alert the prison authorities but they refuse to listen to him. Finally, Fred escapes from prison to avoid further abuse. Fred makes his escape one night but, first thing the next morning, he turns himself in to the local police, telling them who he is, what he has done and why. Fred is immediately arrested and eventually tried for escaping from prison. In this case, Fred will be able to use the necessity defense because he had tried and exhausted his non-criminal options. Further, he will probably succeed with this defense because he can show that as soon as the imminent threat of abuse was over he turned himself in to the proper authorities.
Affixed To This Matter REFERENCES to POLICE and INCARCERATIONS Are The Following Memespace Container Folders:
The defense of duress can be made when the defendant has been forced to commit a criminal act by another person. Please note that the difference between duress and necessity is that necessity can be raised only where the defendant committed his criminal act as a result of the physical forces of nature, whereas the defense of duress is raised when the defendant committed his act as a result of threats made by another person.
There are five different requirements that must be met in order for duress to be raised. First, the defendant must have actually been threatened. Please note that the reasonable belief that he was threatened is not enough. In order to raise the defense, the defendant must have actually been threatened.
Patient To Doctors Note: I, James Martin Driskill, have been actually threatened. An incident that occurred last year when 3 persons in the community apparently were stalking me then proceeded to act violently towards me. In my efforts to flee from these 3 assailants, one threw a liquid filled bottle, that looks like a beer bottle, and the bottle broke across the ground along with the full liquid. In my effort to escape, I found myself tripping in front of an SUV in the middle of the street as the SUV was pulling out of the 7-11 driveway. In my effort to get up quickly, the SUV glanced at me and did not notice me. A HIT and RUN were reported to the San Bernardino Police Department. It would be determined with follow-up doctor care, that my ankle was broken. This began when I was alone minding myself resting by myself before walking home from a long day of walking. 2 of these people started to focus on me. An act of street theatre of gangstalking. Over a period of about 30 minutes, this escolated into physical violence and futher violent intent.
Second, according to the common law, the threat must have been of death or serious bodily harm. However, modern laws do not require that the threat be of death or serious bodily harm and they will often allow the defense even if the threat was of some lesser bodily harm.
Patient To Doctors Note: The Harms of Gangstalking Onto my own personal life have been documented since 2005. Also now provided are the harms that are generated against a certain population class, which I hold the personal understanding to claim to be inclusive of this population. Research Findings published at the NIH.GOV National Institutes of Health on the subject of gangstalking have 3 separate study findings. [ NIH Search : Gangstalking ] Since April of 2020. Last Entry has Notable These Directives / Recommendations To Clinicians:
Introduction
Gangstalking refers to a persecutory belief system wherein those affected believe they are being followed, watched, and harassed by many people in their community who have been recruited into a network of complicit perpetrators [1]. In contrast to traditional forms of stalking that are usually organized by a single person [2], sufferers of gangstalking are unable to identify a responsible individual and experience it as a widely distributed and coordinated effort of co-conspirators.
People affected by gangstalking report that the experience is extremely distressing. The campaign of harassment is frequently experienced as the accumulation of numerous otherwise innocuous acts, such as people clearing their throat, muttering under their breath, or giving lingering glances as they pass on the street. Because each of these acts may individually be passed off as unremarkable and mundane, TIs find it difficult to prove the existence of the harassment. When they come to clinical attention, they are frequently diagnosed with psychiatric illness and their belief systems are labeled as persecutory delusions [4]. However, TIs interpret such diagnoses as part of a gangstalking plan; by making them appear mentally ill, they are further discredited and stigmatized.
NOTE Here is a Gangstalking story Narrative from 1988 [ eighty eight ] Narrated By Star Trek's William Shatner Describing This Street Theater:
Video Title:
William Shatner Exposes the Organized Stalking of Cheryl Welsh on The History Channel
9,051 views
May 9, 2019 Thought Justice
598 subscribers
This video is part of my Medium article that presents evidence of Californians who have become subjected to organized stalking: https://medium.com/@thomas.mcfarlan/t...
Citation:
William Shatner, "Weird or What?", The History Channel, 2012-2013 Season, No Original Source Link Available at this Time
For a comprehensive account of the organized stalking targeted individual war crimes that exploded in scale and scope after 9/11 see my deep-dive Medium article on the subject here: https://medium.com/@thomas.mcfarlan/i...
CONTINUED AGNOTOLOGY
The Link Provided In The Video Results On Medium as:
Error
410
This account is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules.
Yeah Right! How About This Document:
Testimonies of Coordinated Stalking by Multiple Persons
https://www.ohchr.org › Call › Advforhumankind4
PDF
I'm systematically subjected to organized stalking, surveillance and harassment by people in my neighborhood and countless individuals whenever I leave my home.
Testimonies of Coordinated Stalking by Multiple Persons from
California Residents and Former California Residents
Testimonies of 90 persons include:
• Results of reporting the crimes to law enforcement
• Results from visits to mental health professionals
• Net results on victim’s lives as a result of the crimes
Back to NIH.GOV Citation Reference to clinicians:
Our previous work found that concerns about being believed and procuring and presenting proof of their systematic victimization are prime concerns of TIs in online fora [3]
Conclusions:
... highlighted the Derridean concept of différance, wherein the meaning of polysemous signifiers is deferred without definitive resolution. This may be important in communicating with people and patients with persecutory belief systems. Clinicians may consider stepping away from the traditional true/false dichotomy endorsed by psychiatric classification systems and focus on the ambiguity in semiotic systems generally and in persecutory belief systems specifically.
Keywords: internet, discourse analysis, psychosis, delusion, semiotics, linguistics, computer-mediated communication, schizophrenia, eHealth, video, communication, YouTube, social media, discourse, mental health
Back To Reference on Legal Necessity/Duress:
Third, the threat must have been made against another person. Please note that the threat does not have to be against the defendant himself or the defendant’s family. A threat of harm to a complete stranger is enough to give rise to this defense.
Patient To Doctors Note: Both harms is concurrently being done to me along with complete strangers. Much harm is documented in the 3 research findings published at the NIH to those who identify as victims as Targeted Individuals of Gangstalking. The number of actually targeted individuals across the entire nation is unknowable and uncountable when gangstalking is realized as an actual circumstance happening that is researched against the common mistaken belief [ by way of intentional ignorance of agnotology ] that gangstalking is a mass psychosis. Taken that such a mental illness or state of collective mental illness also has a FACT CHECK position by Reuters, There is no such thing as mass paranoia/mass delusional states -- the position of the FACT CHECK ARTICLE has further discounted such claims.
“Mass formation psychosis” is not an academic term recognized in the field of psychology, nor is there evidence of any such phenomenon occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple experts in crowd psychology have told Reuters.
The phrase does not appear in the American Psychological Association (APA) Dictionary of Psychology (dictionary.apa.org/), (dictionary.apa.org/browse/m) nor does it appear in the PsycNet database of published research articles (here), (here).
Numerous psychologists have also told Reuters that such a condition is not officially recognized.
“I have never heard of this concept,” John Drury, Professor of Social Psychology and Director of Research and Knowledge Exchange at the University of Sussex, wrote in an email to Reuters.
Jay Van Bavel, Associate Professor of Psychology and Neural Science at New York University, said the term “doesn’t exist as a real academic concept”, adding: “I’ve been studying group identity and collective behavior for nearly two decades and just published a book on the topic (www.powerofus.online/) and not once have I come across this term.
“It seems to have been made up recently. There are similar-sounding concepts, like ‘mass psychogenic illness,’ (here) but the scope of these is relatively narrow compared to what is being proposed here.”
“It arises out of mass society theories and crowd psychology theories which developed in the 19th century, and which reflected a fear of the masses,” he said. “The claim was that people in the mass lose their sense of identity and their ability to reason, they regress to an inferior mental state where they are manipulable by unscrupulous leaders.
“It has been totally discredited by contemporary work on groups and crowds.”
Van Bavel, who said he found the idea of mass formation psychosis “reductionist”, highlighted a different account of the role of psychology, groups and leadership in the rise of Naziism (here).
who do we listen to? That is a matter of trust and of our social relationship with the source of information.
So, the politicisation and the creation of a sense of an establishment enemy who wants to control us is certainly important. It makes the establishment of trust an absolutely critical aspects [ of #Mpatapo conflict resolution ] hence such things as transparency, respect, clarity etc. become critical.”
He added: “But telling people who disagree with you that they are deluded and in a state of psychosis is essentially a device to silence them and a form of disrespect. It alienates and hence undermines an attempt at dialogue. It isn’t an explanation of the problem; it is part of the problem.”
More Memespace That Is Associated To This -- Part of the Problem!
Fourth, the threat must be of immediate harm. Threats of future harm, no matter how serious they are, are not enough to give rise to this defense.
Finally, it must be shown that the defendant had no opportunity to avoid the threat by a non-criminal method.
Duress is a defense to every crime except intentional killing and attempted intentional killing. While duress is not a defense to intentional killing, it may be used to establish a lack of premeditation. Therefore, while it will not insulate a defendant completely from a conviction, it may help him avoid a murder conviction in favor of a lesser manslaughter conviction.
Further, duress is not available if the defendant either intentionally or recklessly put himself in a position in which he should have foreseen that he would have been subject to duress. See Williams v. State, 646 A.2d 1101 (Md. 1994). For example:
Fred borrows fifty thousand dollars from the Corleone crime family for a period of two months. At the end of two months, Fred cannot pay the money back. Fred is kidnapped by members of the Corleone family and brought in front of Don Corleone, the head of the family. Don Corleone tells Fred that he must pay the money back even if he has to rob a bank to get it or Don Corleone will kill him. Don Corleone gives Fred two days to repay the money. As a result, Fred does, in fact, rob a bank. In this situation Fred will not be able to use duress as a defense to a charge of robbery, because he intentionally placed himself in a position in which he should have foreseen that he would be subject to duress.
This page redirection of priorities paramount [ Not Linked Here... continue reading... ]
MEMETIC RESISTANCE [ UNDERSTOOD ]
NO EXCUSES - YOUR ACTIONS TO
DENY THESE COMMONS ARE FUTILE!
[ THIS PAGE EXISTS ]
[ THIS PAGE IS MEMETICALLY ACTIVE ]
[ SHOULD IT BE PLACED PUBLIC... FOREVER? ]
[ THIS PAGE IS CONSIDERED TEMPORARY ]
Any Questions -- OF course, all of this is to begin to have [ CONFER ]
to a Conversation [ of and for the commonwealth - We The People! ]
TO AVOID CIVIL WAR
Doctor [ Hozair Mohammed Syed MD ]
This HERE is FOR THE HISTORY BOOKS
- GUARANTEED -
We must BEGIN to HAVE a CONVERSATION!
THAT is WHAT we MUST DO!
[ NO MORE DELAY - NO MORE TIME ]
TIME EXPIRED ON YOUR WAY OF COMPARTMENTALIZING OF THE LIES ON THE JANUARY 20TH 2022 SCHEDULED APPOINTMENT!!
Agnotology is among the society!
Not All Here Is Of Your Personal
Interfering Moral Responsibility [ FAULT ]
After passing this page in the universe, it will be.
See Computing and Moral Responsibility
This page WILL SHOW on a GOOGLE SEARCH in your name.
I TOLD YOU SO - YOU DENY THE TRUTH ]
Doris Day - Whatever Will Be Will Be Que Sera Sera (Best All Time Hits Forever 2014 / HQ)
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO [ X9 ]
A Waltz Sir Doctor
The FUTURE IS OURS TO SEE!
Memetics!
Autoplay No Longer Supported By YouTube -- You must HUMAN PRESS PLAY - PRESS PLAY -- THEN CLICK BELOW TO CONTINUE
THIS IS NOT A REQUEST - THIS ACTION IS INDECLINABLE! FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION! PLEASE CONFIRM YOUR ACTIONS IN
OUR TOOL OF CONNECTIVITY -- LIKE NORMAL [ NON-DISABLED ] PEOPLE CAN DO Social Directives [ CDC Disability Inclusion ]
YOUR CARE OR LACK THEREOF [ APATHY ] IS OUTRAGEOUS -- I SHOULD HAVE ADVOCACY OF LIFE RATHER THAN DEATH!
Including people with disabilities in everyday activities and encouraging them to have roles similar to their peers who do not have a disability is disability inclusion. This involves more than simply encouraging people; it requires making sure that adequate policies and practices are in effect in a community or organization.
Inclusion should lead to increased participation in socially expected life roles and activities—such as being a student, worker, friend, community member, patient, spouse, partner, or parent.
Socially expected activities may also include engaging in social activities, using public resources such as transportation and libraries, moving about within communities, receiving adequate health care, having relationships, and enjoying other day-to-day activities.
Disability Inclusion and the Health of People with Disabilities
Disability inclusion allows for people with disabilities to take advantage of the benefits of the same health promotion and prevention activities experienced by people who do not have a disability. Examples of these activities include:
Education and counseling programs that promote physical activity, improve nutrition or reduce the use of tobacco, alcohol or drugs; and
Blood pressure and cholesterol assessment during annual health exams, and screening for illnesses such as cancer, diabetes, and heart disease.
Including people with disabilities in these activities begins with identifying and eliminating barriers to their participation.
Why is This Important?
APPARENTLY YOU ALL DOCTORS DO NOT SIDE ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS DOCUMENT AT THE CDC!
Lyrics
When I was just a little girl
I asked my mother, what will I be
Will I be pretty
Will I be rich
Here's what she said to me
Que sera, sera
Whatever will be, will be
The future's not ours to see
Que sera, sera
What will be, will be
When I grew up and fell in love
Will we have rainbows
Day after day
Here's what my sweetheart said
Que sera, sera
Whatever will be, will be
The future's not ours to see
Que sera, sera
What will be, will be
Now I have children of my own
They ask their mother, what will I be
Will I be handsome
Will I be rich
I tell them tenderly
Que sera, sera
Whatever will be, will be
The future's not ours to see
Que sera, sera
What will be, will be
Que sera, sera
JUST KNOW - YOU HAVE INSULTED THE PEACEMAN - BEYOND THE PALE!
I AM THE ONE WHO KNOWS TOO MUCH - YOU ALL HATE ON ME -- TO DESTROY ME!
THE MAN BRINGING FORWARD THE MESSAGES OF GOOD INTENTIONS!
I DEMAND TO HAVE AN ANSWER TO WHY?? I DEMAND AN ANSWER TO WHY?
I DEMAND YOU RESPECT ME - OR YOU DESERVE TO HAVE YOUR LICENCE
REVOKED - PERMANTENTLY!
I ALSO DEMAND TO HAVE A COMMUNITY APOLOGY FOR WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO ME!
ABSOLUTLY NO QUESTION - I DEMAND PUBLIC ATTENTION!
I DEMAND DELIVERANCE! BOTH WORD MEANINGS BELOW...
I HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG TO DESERVE THIS PUNISHMENT!
RECYLE AFTER RECYCLE AFTER RECYCLE
NO ONE STANDING FOR PEACE?
EVERYONE A PART OF CONSPIRACY??
YOU ALL HAVE SOLD YOUR SOULS
TO THE DEVIL!
MERCY MERCY MERCY
A FOREVERMORE CRUELTY!
STOP THE HATE ALREADY!
GEE WIZZ - WHAT DOES IT TAKE?
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Within the Video Playlist is mentioned Doctor Veronica Kelley,
Director of the San Benardino County Department of Behavioral Health.
This is her MemeSpace Container Folder:
This is already defined -- Addressed to Doctor Alfiee M Breland Noble / Board of Director of CrisisTextLine:
Applies to All DOCTORS of CONCERN:
http://doctor-hozair-mohammed-syed-md.fuckeduphuman.life
This is it! Shit! This is it! Drop This Shit!
The song is very simply about war. Us and them is referring to the sides of the war."God only knows its not what we would choose to do" is saying that he knows that both sides don't really want to be in the war. "And who knows which is which and who is who" is saying that everybody, in the end, is the same. and there is really no point in warring with each other. Some of the stuff i have said may be a tad innaccurate, but I'm only human.
This is the general concept of the song, though.
doctornoamchomsky
on August 14, 2002
A Huge Mistake Is Happening On Your Attempting To Silence Me!
From Having A Conversation About These Matters, Respectfully.
You have a HIDDEN AGENDA that is in
VIOLATION of MY RIGHTS!
IF I were to Interpret The Law,
United States Code Title 18, Section 242,
Even If I Were To Commit Suicide, In Death,
You Would Be Guilty and Depending On The Circumstances,
would be subject to be PUT TO DEATH BY STATE
by the DEATH PENALTY!
IS THAT TRUE? YOU ARE INDEED INSANE!
Image name URL: http://inlandpsych.doctor-hozair-mohammed-syed-md.suicidepreventionlifeline.realuphuman.net/PNG/Screenshot_20220112-170946_Facebook.png
Image Caption: Mobile ScreenShot Facebook App : Notification Message: "You're One Click Away From Confirming Email address [ factsdontlie.hatedon.idied@gmail.com ] https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Updated May 31, 2021
de·liv·er·ance
/d?'liv(?)r?ns/
noun: deliverance; plural noun: deliverances
1.
the action of being rescued or set free.
"prayers for deliverance"
