CDC
INFO; Topic I am STILL DETACHED from HIV SERVICES -- and no one from
the community will rEPLY; [CDC-2197930-Q8K6V8] CRM:01534466
Real Up Human [.net] <realuphuman.net@gmail.com>
Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:37 PM
To:
CDCInfo <cdcinfo@cdcinquiry.onmicrosoft.com>, #StopGangStalking
<contact@stopgangstalking.org>, "timothy.noonan@hhs.gov"
<timothy.noonan@hhs.gov>, ocrmail@hhs.gov
Cc:
Lorraine.Sheridan@curtin.edu.au, Gangstalking aExpert - Doctor Andrew
Lustig <andrew.lustig@camh.ca>, JMIR Support
<support@jmir.org>, mama.firedancer@gmail.com
Please Click On Speaking Head Emoji To Play OGG Audio Media: 24 Mins 39 Secs
The Situation That Is Being Reported Here Are Very Serious.
I am expecting a timely responsive return to my reporting efforts here.
Thank you.
A Copy Of This Address Will Be Sent To The Only Fax Assigned To The CDC
CDC’s
Main Press Line
Phone: (404) 639-3286
Fax: (404)718-1630
and
Health and Human Services
Pacific Region - California,
Michael Leoz, Regional Manager
Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
90 7th Street, Suite 4-100
San Francisco, CA 94103
Customer Response Center: (800) 368-1019
Fax: (202) 619-3818
TDD: (800) 537-7697
Email: ocrmail@hhs.gov
So
CDC can verify the most current information
and best respond to your inquiry, would you please elaborate further on
your question. This information will help us respond to your inquiry.
And This Is My Composed Detail Reply,
Here is that elaboration for your due diligence on these matters.
due dil·i·gence
noun
Law
noun: due diligence
reasonable steps taken by a person in order to satisfy a legal requirement, especially in buying or selling something.
a
comprehensive appraisal of a business undertaken by a prospective
buyer, especially to establish its assets and liabilities and evaluate
its commercial potential.
The hope that you find this in a good-natured tone to bring forward an informed reply back upon me.
I
will just say it plain - for it should be relatable for you --- due to
the research findings that have now been published on the National
Institutes of Health [ HTTP://nih.gov
]. For today's world of interchange and relating to each other,
what appears there for the recent past year and a half is so absolutely
within your reach.
Reflecting on the three research papers appearing since April 6th, 2020, Yes indeed.
This
places those who are involved in the communications between the persons
affected by this [ such as you and I here ] does hold an obligation of
sorts of a complete 180-degree about-face turn into a different
direction AND A DIFFERENT CONSIDERATION [ respect ]. To be communicated
into the transfers of the truism meaning expressed.
That
would be this email into our society to readdress matters that are of a
great need of importance here. These matters if left unanswered
and unaddressed are allowed to be the element that is harming and
injurious to me and many. I must have to realize many as in the
collective tone. It would be many since the published findings appear on
the National Institutes of Health after all.
In
that capacity, I would have to observe the role I write here in a story
of individual over-casting effect on my life, which must also be taken
into retrospect to the collective knowledge that many as we speak are
being harmed by the silence and the delay that has been underway for
years. This remains upon decades back that must be broken to
provide a platform of intelligence and dialogue.
To find the discourse of resource and remedy,
For
right now, I must represent and express to you how hurt and detached I
am attempting to find this resolve on my own life with no working
advocacy to remain connected to me, as I seek out these contacts to my
ruined life.
Ruined into the view of course we have to acknowledge are the collective - of the many.
Published on
June 10, 2016
--- in the New York Times,
As I reaffirm the number of persons involved,
There are tens of thousands if not more in the United States who are
being subjected to this scheme of abuse, particularly mental abuse.
I identify as a Targeted Individual of Gangstalking.
Quoted from the article in 2016,
Yet, the phenomenon remains virtually unresearched.
“What’s scary for me is that there are no counter sites that try and
convince targeted individuals that they are delusional,” Dr. Sheridan
said.
She trying to retain her 2015 published findings on the subject which I will not give it merit to quote.
Along with the full New York Times Article from 2016, the future looks bleak.
Please
now go to the New York Times Article or Link To Spoken Voice Audio
Media to create a bridge of understanding that brings you into view of
the reporting issues and the push back from the uninformed so-called
professionals in the industries involved,
Onto my life, this has been an ongoing never-ending FOREVERMORE CRUEL
[ Google ] set of life circumstances - those dynamics -- for more than
16 years back to the year 2005 without recourse to find some kind of
core realism of some kind of end. The end of the waking daytime
nightmare I live day by day.
The targeting intended to erode trust and destroy my self-worth. The targeting intended to destroy my life.
2.2. Content Analysis. In order to gain insight into the subjective experiences of self-defined victims of gang-stalking, a content analysis was conducted.
[26].
A repositioning point of view of Dr. Sheridan,
Excerpts:
Within the
1. Introduction
This is said:
Stalking by individuals has been found to result in high rates both of
psychological distress and lasting psychiatric morbidity, in particular
post-traumatic symptomatology and depression [1,4,10,18,19,20].
The one study to examine the psychological sequelae of the experience
of being gang stalked found that individuals who had been group or gang
stalked scored significantly higher on ratings of depressive symptoms,
post-traumatic symptomatology and adverse impact on social and
occupational functioning than those who were individually stalked [5].
The only other published study of gang-stalking samples that we could
locate detailed four cases reported by the media of men who had engaged
in extreme violence as a response to the perception that they were the
target of gang stalkers [21]. Both Sheridan and James [5] and Sarteschi [21]
concluded that the subjects of their studies were suffering or had
suffered from severe psychological distress in the context of their
subjective gang-stalking experiences.
4. Discussion
Given
that the available evidence suggests that 12% of stalking reports
involve gang-stalking and that, at a conservative estimate, 8% of women
and 2% of men report being stalked at some point in their lives, it
would appear that the subjective experience of being gang-stalked could
affect around 0.66% of adult women and 0.17% of adult men in the western
world at some point in their lives. It might be assumed that something
that affects the lives of so many people would have been the subject of
extensive research. However, this is not the case.
This
is the first study to examine the phenomena of the gang-stalking
experiences using a methodology that allows categories to emerge de novo
from subjective descriptions. The only other empirical study of
gang-stalking phenomena, of which we are aware, required subjects to fit
their own experiences into categories derived from earlier studies of
those stalked by individuals [5].
The categories of experience arrived at through the content analysis in
the current study are therefore the clearest available expositions of
the core phenomena of gang-stalking. The categories are unlikely to be
exhaustive, given that they are based upon the phenomena that the
individual subjects chose to report. However, they are likely to
constitute those concepts that the individuals considered the most
important. As well as extracting categories from the data, this study
also grouped data into types, offering the first empirical attempt at a
phenomenology of the gang-stalking experience.
5. Conclusions
The
experience of being gang-stalked appears to be a widespread phenomenon
that has been subject to little scientific examination. The current
study provides a preliminary description of the phenomena involved that
was produced by a methodology that did not incorporate pre-conceived
assumptions. This provides a foundation upon which further research
could be built. It also serves to confirm the harmful effects of the
gang-stalking experience upon sufferers, first set out in the only other
study available [5]. These findings constitute a potent reason why gang-stalking should be regarded as an important subject for study.
Whilst
it was important to adopt a methodology that allowed the phenomena
constituting the experience of gang-stalking to emerge de novo, it would
now be appropriate to conduct studies of cases based upon specific
questions in order to gain a clearer idea of the proportion of sufferers
who experience each category of phenomenon, as the main categories have
now been elucidated and the core phenomena described. This is because
higher proportions are likely to be elicited through direct questioning
than were found by studying internet descriptions. Finally, whilst this
study has described the core phenomena of the gang-stalking experience,
the question remains as to whether gang-stalking is a single phenomenon
or represents several overlapping phenomena, each with its own defining
pattern of experiences.
----
With now -- actually, researched findings published to the NIH, to make a new conclusive position.
-- a new finding -- a new truth.
Not that I can see -- in all honesty.
What
appears at the Psychology Today published three-part article - By
Doctor Joseph Pierre, absolutely drained of scholarly integrity. I
have put the article and its author into view.
The
article that appears this day -- is in fact an instrument and goal
intended to carry a false narrative, to hold a mass ignorance against
shining light to the truth.
The article of Dr. Pierre -- [ ID: @PsychUnseen ] is straight dope - agnotology.
Part 1: The paranoid reality of "targeted individuals."
This is in view of my publically visible LIVE
LIFE JOURNAL WEBSPACE -- Nothing I am doing wrong here, nothing illegal
-- nothing false -- nothing fake.
In my own healthcare, I have detachments in
all of civil society to be able to bring this subject forward with
discussion and merit. The merit of the so-called experts of
doctors. That would include my very last Doctor in my HIV care,
Dr. Eric Tomomi Shigeno. When I attempted to bring these matters
involved into my HIV Care session, in view of the quality of care that I
was receiving, including my distortion that I had been receiving from
the local AIDS SERVICE ORGANIZATION of the Foothill Aids Project in San
Bernardino CA. When I attempted to bring this matter into a discussion
with my HIV Care Doctor, he terminated my care. I have not been
able to get my care to reset - several resets attempted. My Humana
Insurance Care and Customer Services also has been negatively affected
by this subject to cause the ghosting of the conversation channels with
Humana Help Customer Support and my Insurance Agent to also refuse to
return my communication attempts. These attempts are many.
Once
again, as the CDC involves in this address individually... I have not
been able to get a reliance and trust pathway to link to and obtain an
HIV Care provider doctor care.
My posting across the web and previously shared to the CDC in all of this has been placed:
The
representing agencies of those outsides of my patient side of this must
be placed into a correction of their beliefs on this subject to have
the intention to just ignore me. Those sources to keep this lie
alive happens to be the one I seek to contact at the CDC. So,
since I am writing out this fact, and I demand to have an audience with
CDC imperatives.
I
will not receive a response now -- you will not reply --- you will hold
your involvement of truth onto this discourse. In that silence,
people are being harmed greatly. As published on the National
Institutes of Health.
The
next two research papers that have been published on this subject, both
confirm that gangstalking is a real thing that is happening and being
discussed on the internet --- the science that puts these matters to the
research, logic is sound and not disputed. The science involved
here has merit to accept the findings
of
these two papers along with the new position of Dr. Sheridan ---
someone at the CDC should take this subject into the accounting and
remove the constraints you have -- remove the blocks that are being
waged against the truth. Remove the agnotology --- declare a
public service address on the subject of gangstalking. Take on the
role to enforce the laws instead of being the agent that condones the
violations of our laws and of our human decency. Step up to the
table with some augmented conscience.
Please sirs -- Please --
Can I have your attention to these other research findings on gangstalking published at the National Institutes of Health,
Subsequetionally, will you please respond to this communication from a citizen of the United States?
You
as a public official and a public employee in the deliverance of
careful interface between the government and its citizens when you do
honor the need of a response, would you please provide your full human
name, sir.
I do have a prior connection and a letter signed by Timothy Noonan
in view of history here. The letter he signed was a ruling
against my claim/complaint that I filed upon the actions of my HIV
provider care, Doctor Eric Tomoni Shigeno.
May I have the direct attention of Timothy Noonan [ in CC: ] ?
Or
will this email communication attempt be completely ignored, thus
providing the element of default assignment of guilt? Hello, is
there anybody out there?
As
the community local to me knows, Doctor Shigeno passed away on April
10th, 2020, when in the view of things, he and I never found agreement.
He filed a harassment complaint against me which was way way way
outrageous upon the circumstances. Be it that, he was successful
to get a restraining order against me. I told the San Bernardino
Police officers that we dispatched in the time prior to this that I
would indeed violate any kind of restraining order if need be.
About 10 days prior to Dr. Shigeno's death, I did indeed violate the
restraining order.
If
only Tim Noonan would have actually taken the view of my case in the
patient's view, perhaps the outcome that ran its course could have been
avoided.
The
burden that Dr. Shigeno had onto the wrongdoing showing, perhaps the
ruling in my favor for what was truly a violation of the law on Dr.
Shigeno's part.
The official cause of death was a stroke.
This Facebook post by @BorregoHealth : [ Sadden To Share That Doctor Shigeno Passed Away
] was commented on by me. The choice to BLOCK ME has been UNJUST
by the COMMUNITY as a whole, EVERYONE protecting a CONSPIRACY.
Taking
all that I know and have discovered about what is interwoven in this
topic of gangstalking, I have my great suspicion that Dr. Shigeno
committed suicide because of the pressures to not be able to come
forward with these matters. Especially the defense and position
that I actually attempted to get the attention of the court in the
harassment complaint case.
In the days prior to his death, I did indeed violate the restraining order.
The
focus of advice published by Doctor Andrew Lustig in the change and
modification of communication standards -- must be appreciated by all of
my contacts to civil society. It says specifically,
"
This
may be important in communicating with people and patients with
persecutory belief systems."
EXACTLY!
"
This
observation may have important clinical ramifications."
"The prospect of a clinician definitively establishing the truth or
falsity of a delusional belief system is often impractical or
impossible."
"Often when a clinician states that a belief system is untrue or
impossible, they are relying on their own beliefs, biases, and cultural
referents.
"
"
Ultimately, all users of semiotic systems—patients and clinicians
alike—are subject to the same fundamental limits on communication and
understanding inherent in language and all symbolic systems. Such a
humbling realization may help to promote empathy and understanding and
reduce stigma affecting people afflicted by persecutory belief systems."
Background: Gangstalking is a novel persecutory belief
system whereby those affected believe they are being followed, stalked,
and harassed by a large ...
Conclusions:
The study found that contributors to the study corpus accomplished
a number of tasks. They used linguistic practices to co-construct an
internally coherent and systematized persecutory belief system. They
advanced a position that gangstalking is real and contested the
medicalizing discourse that gangstalking is a form of mental disorder.
They supported one another by sharing similar experiences and providing
encouragement and advice. Finally, they commiserated over the challenges
of proving the existence of gangstalking.
Background: Gangstalking refers to a novel persecutory
belief system wherein sufferers believe that they are being followed,
watched, and harassed by ...
Clinical Implications
This
observation may have important clinical ramifications. Traditionally,
psychiatrists define delusions as fixed beliefs that are not amenable to
change, considering conflicting evidence [47]. An alternative definition is that delusions are beliefs that are demonstrably untrue or not shared by others [48]. However, these and other definitions of delusions fall short, and arriving at a definitive definition may be impossible [49].
The prospect of a clinician definitively establishing the truth or
falsity of a delusional belief system is often impractical or
impossible. Often when a clinician states that a belief system is untrue
or impossible, they are relying on their own beliefs, biases, and
cultural referents. By shifting, instead, to a linguistic or semiotic
understanding of delusions as belief systems that are unresolvable or
that defer understanding ad infinitum, clinicians may sidestep the
difficulties inherent in existing definitions. Ultimately, all users of
semiotic systems—patients and clinicians alike—are subject to the same
fundamental limits on communication and understanding inherent in
language and all symbolic systems. Such a humbling realization may help
to promote empathy and understanding and reduce stigma affecting people
afflicted by persecutory belief systems.
Conclusions:
These data provide insight into a novel persecutory belief system.
Interpersonal concerns are important for people affected, and they
construe others as either sympathetic or hostile. They create positive
ambient affiliation with viewers. We found that vloggers use multimodal
deixis to illustrate the salience of the belief system. The videos
highlighted the Derridean concept of différance, wherein the meaning of
polysemous signifiers is deferred without definitive resolution. This
may be important in communicating with people and patients with
persecutory belief systems. Clinicians may consider stepping away from
the traditional true/false dichotomy endorsed by psychiatric
classification systems and focus on the ambiguity in semiotic systems
generally and in persecutory belief systems specifically.
------
Now I have to pause.
Did you get all of that right?
Repeating,
Please sirs -- Please --
Can I have your attention to these other research findings on gangstalking published at the National Institutes of Health,
Subsequetionally, will you please respond to this communication from a citizen of the United States?
You
as a public official and a public employee in the deliverance of
careful interface between the government and its citizens when you do
honor the need of a response, would you please provide your full human
name, sir.
So
CDC can verify the most current information
and best respond to your inquiry, would you please elaborate further on
your question. This information will help us respond to your inquiry.
CDC-INFO
is a service of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). This service is provided by the
Verizon and MAXIMUS contract with CDC and ATSDR.
RK
--------------- Original Message---------------
Sent: 11/28/2021
From: General Public
Subject: I am STILL DETACHED from HIV SERVICES -- and no one from the community will rEPLY
Question:
I just cam not understand how everyone in civil society has chosen to
avoid responding
to me. My last HIV CARE doctor was in March of 2019 --- Dr.
Shigeno terminated my care when I attempted to bring forward topics that
are now being discussed under the term of gangstalking. HE
TERMINATED NY CAREabd and actually not one other doctor I have
attempted ot gain and put into my reference care has DEMONSTRATED a
TRUST LEVEL that I can be comfortable with having care. I have
tried to reset my PRIMARY CARE and JID Referral with HUMANA ---to going
through all of the LOCAL AREA Doctors available to this
CAUSE; I just cannot initiate PATIENT-CENTERED conversation with
these people. IT IS AN OUTRAGE!
My Humana Rep Will does not return my calls. No one -- -absolutely no
one will take the role to respond a response of responsibility onto my
care. I am going to die in this detachment that you all can't be
real. I do not know how you all sleep at night?
==-=
My name is James Martin Driskill and I have been posting on social media
for a very long time and absolutely no one will return any kind of
response which just tells me you all don't care that I am on a pathway
of death.
I cannot understand the detention of you all secrets that allow my life
to just go poof, and I die. I really cannot understand you all sitting
in the background as you know I have reached out time and time again,
and still, nothing trustworthy of healthcare
and insurance management will progress upward into a conversation with
me. I get blocked everywhere I go attempting to resolve these matters. I
am sick sick sick and tired of trying.. It is all just a waste of time.
New Research on NIH.GOV should be shone into view -- give me my life back, please!
![[DIR]](CDCINFO-IAmStillDetachedFromHIVDoctorCare-HIVUntreatable-Diligence_files/O6CDd7JDkZrgUmtjcpn2gCNJouc4TNCH6MxhE3o54a_kCBJVe39gm0pKIaQw.gif)
